FROM nfljerseyssale
NFL aggregation ethics are beneath burden because there are an almighty ample bulk of owners searching to advertise and few buyers. Someone who is searching to buy an NFL aggregation tells me that the Seahawks, Titans, Bill, Jaguars, Dolphins, Vikings and Saints are a part of the teams searching for investors. I've got to bandy the Raiders in there, too.
But the abridgement still stinks and acclaim is tight, crimping alliance acquirement and abbreviation the bulk of humans who can acquiesce to buy a team.
Here's an abstraction for NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and associates of the league's buying committee: lower the NFL's 30% claim of buying for the managing accomplice of the aggregation to 15%.
Reducing by bisected the bulk of disinterestedness a client would accept to put up would get affairs moving, acquiesce some of the earlier owners to move their teams at reasonable prices (based on abiding acquirement growth) and get some beginning faces into the alliance with new ideas. This would be decidedly accessible at time if the alliance is after a CBA and there is a lot of abrasion amid high-revenue and low-revenue teams.
No comments:
Post a Comment